Concrete being-there does not first acquire an interpretation through him, but rather it belongs to being-there itself to have an interpretation of itself that, to a certain degree, is always already carried along with it. The intelligibility in which being-there moves, the One, is grounded ultimately in δóξα, in the average meanings of things and of oneself. This self-evident meaning that being-there has regarding itself is, in the first place, the source on whose basis Aristotle   explicitly orients himself to the question of how being-there itself thinks concretely about that in terms of which it has its genuine completedness. For this reason, Aristotle characterizes his method as investigating λóγοι ἐκ [ . . . ] [τῶν κατὰ τὸν βίον πράξεων] καὶ περὶ τούτων [EN1 1095 a 3 sq]. What he makes out about being-there is drawn from how being-there speaks about itself, and indeed with respect to the “tending of life.” [Heidegger  , GA18:73-74]